Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Accurso et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2023cv08585
Plaintiff:
Renee Accurso, Jacques Alllouf, Louis Arfe and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
Jackson v. American Wagering, Inc.
as 5:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Jackson
Defendant:
American Wagering, Inc. doing business as William Hill and Caesars Sportsbook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Vickers v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01440
Plaintiff:
Lachae Vickers
Defendant:
Caesars Entertainment, Inc. and American Wagering, Inc. d/b/a William Hill and Caesars Sportsbook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Messina et al v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06561
Plaintiff:
Joseph Messina, Kaycie Hays, Maxwell Heider and others
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., James Monsees, Adam Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. Fisher
as 3:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
William Hill
Defendant:
Richard Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Cook et al
as 3:2021cv00239
Defendant:
George Bozzi, Rollin Cook and Allison Black
Plaintiff:
William Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Hill v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv00712
Defendant:
Vincent Illuzzi, United States of America and Sven Olson
Plaintiff:
William Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr
Hill v. Graham
as 1:2015cv01235
Petitioner:
William Hill
Respondent:
Harold Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv01864
Plaintiff:
William Hill
Defendant:
City of New York, Ray/Raymond Kelly, Robert Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
