Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Williams v. Syracuse University et al
as 5:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Brandon Williams
Defendant:
Syracuse University, Board of Trustees of Syracuse University, Robert Hradsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Hardy (Thomas)
as 13-3161
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Preston Hardy, AKA Peanut, James Glover, AKA Tone, Michael Glover, AKA Mike-Mike and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Shawn Thomas
United States of America v. Hardy
as 13-1075
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Preston Hardy, James Glover, AKA Tone, Terrance Gonzalez, AKA Gucci, AKA Geeze and others
Defendant - Appellant:
James Hardy, AKA Light, Terrell Lucas, AKA Ruger Rell and Michael Glover, AKA Mike-Mike
United States of America v. Hardy (Glover)
as 13-743
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Preston Hardy, AKA Peanut, James Glover, AKA Tone, Brandon Williams, AKA Big Boy and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Glover, AKA Mike-Mike and Terrell Lucas, AKA Ruger Rell
United States of America v. Hardy (Lucas)
as 12-4840
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Preston Hardy, AKA Peanut, James Glover, AKA Tone, Michael Glover, AKA Mike-Mike and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Terrell Lucas, AKA Ruger Rell
Williams v. The New York State Supreme Court et al
as 1:2010cv07716
Plaintiff:
Brandon Williams
Defendant:
The New York State Supreme Court and Andrew Cuomo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Cuomo
as 1:2010cv04200
Defendant:
Andrew Cuomo
Plaintiff:
Brandon Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Municipal Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00164
Defendant:
City of New York, Municipal Corporation, New York City Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
