Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Monroe Bullock v. Gary Buck, et al
as 14-4559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONROE E. BULLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY BUCK, Counselor, MAXELL, C.O., Laundry Foreman and ROBERT F. SCOTT, Lieutenant
Patrell Barnett v. New Jersey Transit Corp
as 14-1281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRELL BARNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORP, NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS INC, JOHN CALIA, Locomotive Engineer and others
Frederick Banks v. S. O.
as 14-1218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. O., M. O., DIRECTOR CIA and others
Debtor - Appellee:
M. O.
Frederick Banks v. United Safety Service, et al
as 13-4452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS, AN AMERICAN INDIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED SAFETY SERVICE, DAVID ANDERCHAK, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
USA v. Foreman Salmond
as 12-1066
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FOREMAN SALMOND
Darrius Copelin v. Curt Rothermel, et al
as 11-4493
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DARRIUS COPELIN
Defendant - Appellant:
CURT ROTHERMEL
Defendant - Appellee:
L. CRESSINGER, Foreman (CMS), BENFER, Lieutenant, B. A. BLEDSOE, Warden and others
Debtor - Appellee:
C. MAOIRANA
James Dickerson v. Desimone Inc, et al
as 09-4054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DICKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DESIMONE INC, RANDY FOREMAN and ANTHONY WEISS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-3484
Debtor - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miles Lee v. Lindsey, et al
as 08-2456
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILES ORLANDO LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
BELL, D.H.O., COOK, D.H.O., DUNSTONE, D.H.O. and others
Defendant:
PERRIN, Lieutenant and REIBSOME, case manager
Davila-Bajana v. Holohan, et al
as 08-1013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN DAVILA-BAJANA
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM HOLOHAN, UNICOR BUSINESS MANAGER, SAPKO, UNICOR FACTORY MANAGER, DEBRA FORSYTH, SUPERINTENDENT OF INDUSTRIES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
