Cases 11 - 20 of 546
Julio Aviles, Sr.In re: Julio Aviles, Sr.
as 24-1055
Petitioner:
In re: JULIO AVILES, SR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Urve Maggitti v. John Capuzzi, Sr., et al
as 23-3274
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
HONORABLE JOHN P. CAPUZZI, SR., In his Official Capacity as Judge, DEBRA RYAN, District Attorney, in her Official Capacity as District Attorney, DANIEL E. ROLAND, Assistant District Attorney, in his Official Capacity as Assistant District Attorney and others
Julio Aviles, Sr. v. USA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 23-3224
Plaintiff:
JULIO AVILES, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jason Brown, et al v. Cyrus Dolbin, et al
as 23-3143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON L. BROWN and A. M. B., Minor Child of Jason L. Brown
Defendant:
CYRUS P. DOLBIN, Judge, MARK A. BARKET, Custody Officer, KAREN E. RISMILLER, Lawyer and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. DOMALAKES, Judge, DAVID RICE, Asst. DA, MICHEAL A. STINE, Public Defender and others
Christopher Martz, Sr. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co
as 23-2691
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MARTZ, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2609
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas Hill, Sr.In re: Thomas Hill, Sr.
as 23-2591
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS L. HILL, SR.
Respondent:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 23-2522
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Bruce Evans, Sr.
as 23-2534
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRUCE EVANS, SR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.