Cases 1 - 10 of 633
Kevin Coit v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2322
Defendant:
SGT HUNT, State Trooper, LT DIEHL, SUPERINTENDENT KLINEFIELDER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Board of Trustees Plumbers and Pipefitters Local U, et al v. Jones Lang Lasalle Americas Inc
as 24-2291
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO 74 SCHOLARSHIP FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO 74 EDUCATIONAL PAC FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO 74 APPRENTICESHIP FUND and others
Defendant:
JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS INC
Deandre Jones v. Superintendent Pine Grove SCI, et al
as 24-2158
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PINE GROVE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY INDIANA COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE PAYTON JONES
David Jaroslawicz, et al v. M&T Bank Corp, et al
as 24-8025
Petitioner:
BELINA FAMILY and JEFF KRUBLIT
Respondent:
M&T BANK CORP, HUDSON CITY BANCORP INC, RENE F. JONES and others
David Jaroslawicz, et al v. M&T Bank Corp, et al
as 24-8024
Petitioner:
BELINA FAMILY and JEFF KRUBLIT
Respondent:
M&T BANK CORP, HUDSON CITY BANCORP INC, ROBERT G. WILMERS and others
Nicholas Edwards, et al v. J. Rivello, et al
as 24-2031
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS EDWARDS, LAEL BROWN, MUWSA GREEN and others
Defendant:
N. DAVIS, Medical Department Supervisor, A. WAKEFIELD, Facility Grievance Coordinator, GEORGE M. LITTLE, Secretary of Department of Correction and others
Matthew Jones v. Fouad El Chidiak
as 24-1950
Defendant:
DR. FOUAD EL CHIDIAK
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Kenneth ThorntonIn re: Kenneth Thornton
as 24-1941
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH E. THORNTON
Respondent:
BEAVER COUNTY DETECTIVES OFFICE, in her official capacity, PETER CARBONE, in his individual and official capacity, MARLENE EVERETTE, in her individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
LISA JONES, in her individual capacity and SHARON D. BUCKLEY, in her individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
