Cases 1 - 10 of 1,473
Kenneth ThorntonIn re: Kenneth Thornton
as 24-1941
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH E. THORNTON
Respondent:
BEAVER COUNTY DETECTIVES OFFICE, in her official capacity, PETER CARBONE, in his individual and official capacity, MARLENE EVERETTE, in her individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
LISA JONES, in her individual capacity and SHARON D. BUCKLEY, in her individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jay Lin, et al v. Hudson City Savings Bank, et al
as 24-1936
Plaintiff:
JAY J. LIN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and IRENE H. LIN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANK, M&T BANK and PARKER MCCAY, PA
Mark Woods v. Shawn Wills, et al
as 24-1928
Plaintiff:
MARK WOODS
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER SHAWN WILLS, #3680 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O THOMAS STRAIN, #4005 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O LT. HOYT, #225 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Andrew Fullman v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-1544
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FULLMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, BUREAU OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF ADJUDICATION and others
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
East Ohio Capital LLC v. City of Pittsburgh Zoning Board of Adjustment, et al
as 24-1453
Plaintiff:
EAST OHIO CAPITAL LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and LASHAWN M. BURTON FAULK, individually
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
