Cases 1 - 10 of 641
Beau Chermer v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 24-2325
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
Plaintiff:
BEAU CHERMER
Richard Grosso v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 24-2464
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. GROSSO
Lavond Hill v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-2171
Defendant:
GILL, PUSHKALAI PILLAI, DR. RAMIREZ and others
Plaintiff:
LAVOND A. HILL
Neil Pal v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 24-2196
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LACKAWANNA COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
NEIL PAL
Phillip RehwaldIn re: Phillip Rehwald
as 24-2370
Respondent:
MAUREEN P. KELLY, CATHY BISSOON and SCI GREENE
Petitioner:
In re: PHILLIP REHWALD
Nicholas Edwards, et al v. J. Rivello, et al
as 24-2031
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS EDWARDS, LAEL BROWN, MUWSA GREEN and others
Defendant:
N. DAVIS, Medical Department Supervisor, A. WAKEFIELD, Facility Grievance Coordinator, GEORGE M. LITTLE, Secretary of Department of Correction and others
Courtney Green v. IZOD Corporate Office & Headquarters, et al
as 24-1927
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY GREEN
Defendant:
IZOD CORPORATE OFFICE & HEADQUARTERS and PRENTICE HALL CORPORATION SYSTEM INC.
Arthur Bomar v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 24-9001
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR BOMAR
Edwin Romero v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2015
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
EDWIN ROMERO
Edwin Romero v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2105
Plaintiff:
EDWIN ROMERO
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
