Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,060
Kareem Millhouse v. Heath, et al
as 24-2132
Plaintiff: KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant: SUZANNE V. HEATH, JAMES FOSNOT, DAVID EBBERT and others
Marianne Sawicki v. Michael Kipphan, et al
as 24-2120
Plaintiff: MARIANNE SAWICKI
Defendant: MICHAEL M. KIPPHAN, LORI HEATON, RICHARD A. WILSON and others
Wesley-Keith Mullings v. Harriet Raghnal, et al
as 24-2055
Plaintiff: WESLEY-KEITH MULLINGS, Holder in due course of WESLEY KEITH MULLINGS and holder in due course of ISAIAH KEISHON MULLINGS, sui juris,and Trustee of Wesley Keith Mullings Trust
Defendant: HARRIET ELAINE RAGHNAL, Bar # 006762006, AISHA MARGARET SMITH, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Marianne Sawicki v. Michael Kipphan, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff: MARIANNE SAWICKI
Defendant: MICHAEL M. KIPPHAN, LORI HEATON, RICHARD A. WILSON and others
Nicholas Edwards, et al v. J. Rivello, et al
as 24-2031
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS EDWARDS, JOHN HIGHTOWER, MUWSA GREEN and others
Defendant: JOHN RIVELLO, Warden SCI-Huntingdon, A. WAKEFIELD, Facility Grievance Coordinator, N. DAVIS, Medical Department Supervisor and others
USA v. Dameia Smith
as 24-2020
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DAMEIA O. SMITH, a/k/a Omar, a/k/a D
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2007
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lucille Farrell-Scott, et al v. Committee of Managers of Llewellyn Park, et al
as 24-1965
Plaintiff: LUCILLE FARRELL-SCOTT and SUNNE-RYSE SMITH
Defendant: COMMITTEE OF MANAGERS OF LLEWELLYN PARK and TRUSTEES OF LLEWELLYN PARK
Ashley Georges v. Helen Godby, et al
as 24-1884
Plaintiff: ASHLEY GEORGES
Defendant: HELEN C. GODBY and YVONNE SMITH SEGARS
Sheila Eyajan v. Andrews and Pontius LLC, et al
as 24-1923
Plaintiff: SHEILA MARIE EYAJAN
Defendant: ANDREWS AND PONTIUS LLC, CAROLYN E. SMITH, DALE C. SMITH and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?