Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 279
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1809
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Walter Parfaite
as 24-1686
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: WALTER KENNETH PARFAITE
Katrina Dansby v. Kristen Bleiweis, et al
as 24-1624
Plaintiff: KATRINA DANSBY
Defendant: KRISTEN BLEIWEIS, MCCALLA RAYNER LEIBERT PIERCE LLC, PACIFIC UNION FINANCIAL and others
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff: MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant: EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor: TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Walter Chruby v. Kirk Bearjar, et al
as 24-1200
Plaintiff: WALTER A. CHRUBY
Defendant: KIRK BEARJAR, ANNETTE KOWALEWSKI, JENNIFER SHROCK and others
USA v. Walter Himmelreich
as 23-3052
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: WALTER HIMMELREICH
Armoni Johnson v. Walter Koehler, et al
as 23-2995
Plaintiff / Appellant: ARMONI MASUD JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee: WALTER KOEHLER, CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN and CHRISTOPHER LAMB
Defendant: JUDGE PIERANTONI, JUDGE AUGELLO, JUDGE BROWN and others
Palani Karupaiyan v. , et alIn re: Palani Karupaiyan v. , et al
as 23-2878
Petitioner: In re: PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Plaintiff: P. P., R. P. and SANTHOSH SUBRAMANIYAN
Respondent: JUDGE SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTRAURANTS, individually and in her capacity as Judge of Appellate division of NJ, JUDGE L. NAGANANDA, individually and in her capacity as Judge of Appellate division of NJ, JUDGE NAGA LAW FIRM, individually and in her capacity as Judge of Appellate division of NJ and others
Walter DiBease, et al v. USA
as 23-2779
Plaintiff / Appellant: WALTER DIBEASE
Plaintiff / Appellee: MONICA DIBEASE
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Walter Anderson v. Michael Dohman, et al
as 23-2603
Plaintiff / Appellant: WALTER ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL DOHMAN and KATHY BRITTAIN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?