Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Cody, II v. Howell et al
as 1:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Cody, II
Defendant:
Marc S. Howell, Stephen Marte, Even McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Negron-Roche v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Negron-Roche
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail, Kifer, Henri Estrada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cody, II v. Howell et al
as 1:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Cody, II
Defendant:
Marc S. Howell and Harrisburg City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Howell et al
as 1:2023cv01274
Plaintiff:
Leeanne Evans
Defendant:
Howard Howell and 3M Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Howell v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2022cv01255
Plaintiff:
Reverand Wesley Howell
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Kevin Ransom, Paul Bach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell, III v. Design Sentence Comptation Ctr et al
as 1:2022cv00911
Petitioner:
Ollie W. Howell, III
Respondent:
Design Sentence Comptation Ctr and Acting Warden (AW) Rickerd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor, Jr. v. Yampolsky et al
as 3:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
Frank Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Yampolsky, Superintendent Sommers, Yhetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Kyeremeh v. Crawford et al
as 1:2021cv00742
Defendant:
William M. Crawford and Howell's Motor Freight, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Francis Kyeremeh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
