Cases 131 - 140 of 183
SPEARMAN v. MORRIS et al
as 2:2014cv01751
Plaintiff:
RAPHAEL MOSES SPEARMAN
Defendant:
A. J. MORRIS and W. HOLLOWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIOUX v. GREENE et al
as 2:2014cv01670
Plaintiff:
SANDRA BELLE RIOUX
Defendant:
THOMAS GREENE, JOSEPH STEPANSKY, JOSHUA ALFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. BAKOS et al
as 3:2014cv00201
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE MORRIS
Defendant:
R. BAKOS and JOSEPH DUPONT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARREN v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 3:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
DAVID MORRIS BARREN
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, TROOPER WESLEY BERKEBILE, TROOPER SERGEANT ANTHONY DELUCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BREELAND v. CODY et al
as 2:2014cv00764
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BREELAND
Defendant:
CODY and MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARREN v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2014cv00692
Plaintiff:
DAVID MORRIS BARREN
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, WILKINS TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILKINSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. BARREN et al
as 2:2014cv00622
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Claimant:
DAVID MORRIS BARREN
Defendant:
SIXTY EIGHT THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS IN U.S. CURRENCY, ($68,950.00)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. CAMERON, et al
as 3:2014cv00077
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P. JACKSON
Defendant:
CAMERON, HOLLINBAUGH, CLOSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLETT v. HARRINGTON et al
as 3:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH WILLETT
Defendant:
JAMES HARRINGTON , KENNETH CAMERON , JAMIE BOYLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
