Cases 11 - 20 of 51,197
BRANCH v. C/O. DILLARD et al
as 2:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
WERDELL BRANCH
Defendant:
C/O. DILLARD and C/O. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCLAURIN v. CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
DORRELL ANTWUN MCLAURIN
Defendant:
CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT., JOHN DOE, DET. PILARSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BERLEKAMP FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC v. PIPICH et al
as 2:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
BERLEKAMP FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant:
THOMAS PIPICH, THOMAS BARTON CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, BARTOM INVESTMENTS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
DEVLIEGER v. WARREN et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
CARL L DEVLIEGER
Defendant:
CITY OF WARREN and PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASTOR v. GALICH et al
as 2:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
RICARDO CASTOR
Defendant:
OFFICER DUSTIN GALICH, OFFICER JARRET KASPRYSZYN, OFFICER JOSHUA STEGENA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CONONIE v. BOROUGH OF WEST VIEW et al
as 2:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
PAUL-ANTHONY CONONIE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF WEST VIEW, MICHAEL BRUNNER, RICHARD G. OPIELA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
ZERUTH v. WARDEN OF SCI FOREST
as 1:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
JUSTIN ZERUTH
Respondent:
WARDEN OF SCI FOREST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
