Cases 41 - 50 of 54
SAWL v. THE BOROUGH OF WEST KITTANNING et al
as 2:2010cv00008
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SAWL
Defendant:
THE BOROUGH OF WEST KITTANNING, CLIFFORD J. NEAL, KENNETH D. TRUDGEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. COOK et al
as 2:2009mc00319
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
TREVOR G. COOK, PATRICK J. KILEY, UBS DIVERSIFIED GROWTH, LLC and others
Receiver:
R. J. ZAYED and CARLSON, CASPERS, VANDENBURGH & LINDQUIST
ANSELL v. ROSS TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2009cv01398
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ANSELL
Defendant:
ROSS TOWNSHIP, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, MATTHEW E. GRUBB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SNEE v. BARONE
as 1:2009cv00147
Petitioner:
RONALD CLIFFORD SNEE, JR
Respondent:
MICHAEL BARONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BROWN v. MR. MICHAEL ZENK et al
as 3:2008cv00231
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD BROWN
Respondent:
MR. MICHAEL ZENK, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and CORNELL COMPANIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SNEE v. BARONE
as 2:2008cv01562
Petitioner:
RONALD CLIFFORD SNEE, JR
Respondent:
MICHAEL BARONE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SNEE v. VESSEL/DEBTOR/ENS LEGIS
as 1:2008cv00198
Plaintiff:
RONALD CLIFFORD SNEE
Defendant:
VESSEL/DEBTOR/ENS LEGIS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STANLEY v. SOBINA et al
as 1:2008cv00137
Petitioner:
BILLY CLIFFORD STANLEY
Respondent:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
