Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BAMBLING v. LAW OFFICE OF HARRISON ROSS BYCK, ESQ., P.C. et al
as 3:2011cv00226
Plaintiff:
SHAWNA BAMBLING
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF HARRISON ROSS BYCK, ESQ., P.C. and CACH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BAUER v. CACH, LLC. et al
as 2:2011cv00207
Plaintiff:
DONALD J. BAUER
Defendant:
CACH, LLC. and HARRISON ROSS BYCK, ESQ., P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HARRISON v. ASTRUE
as 2:2010cv01569
Plaintiff:
PIERCE HARRISON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SMITH-HARRISON v. GLOBAL FITNESS HOLDINGS, LLC.
as 2:2010cv01105
Plaintiff:
TEISHA SMITH-HARRISON
Defendant:
GLOBAL FITNESS HOLDINGS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
PENNAVARIA v. WALTON et al
as 2:2010cv00415
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. PENNAVARIA
Defendant:
JOHN R. WALTON, STEVE CMAR, SGT. RICHARD PLANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. PROVIDENT ROYALTIES, LLC et al
as 2:2009mc00327
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
PROVIDENT ROYALTIES, LLC, PROVIDENT ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, PROVIDENT ENERGY 1, LP and others
Receiver:
DENNIS L. ROOSSIEN, JR.
HARRSON v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI HUNTINGDON et al
as 2:2009cv00574
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HARRISON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI HUNTINGDON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCKNIGHT v. OFFICER RALPH VARROTO et al
as 2:2009cv00296
Plaintiff:
SHARON MCKNIGHT
Defendant:
OFFICER RALPH VARROTO, OFFICER HARRISON HARBAUGH, GILPIN TOWNSHIP, LEECHBURG BOROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
