Cases 61 - 70 of 121
NIXON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2019cv00602
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER, JOHN I DOE, C.O. JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
MARK A. NIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BLAIR et al v. ROBERTS et al
as 2:2019cv00521
Plaintiff:
SHARON BLAIR, JEFFREY SCOTT BLAIR and CYNTHIA BLAIR
Defendant:
FNU KEZMARSKY, JACOB ROBERTS and JOHN/JANE DOE(S)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOTON v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2019cv00008
Defendant:
DEPUTY MAZUKIEWIEZ, LIEUTENANT SUPERVISED CELL EXTRACTION TEAM UNIT, DORINE VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
MYRON MOTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HAMMONDS v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01389
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN "JOHN DOE" ZEPPO, DEPUTY WARDEN "JOHN DOE" WAINWRIGHT, MAINT. SUPERVISOR AMELIA BENNETT and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN HAMMONDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WESTERFIELD v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2018cv00275
Plaintiff:
RONNY J. WESTERFIELD
Defendant:
ALEXIS SACARA, MICHAEL CLARK, DOCTOR JOSE BOGGIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JOHNSON v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv00588
Plaintiff:
RODERICK JOHNSON
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANGLE v. SUPERINTENDANT OVERMYER et al
as 1:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ANGLE, II
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT OVERMYER, SCI FOREST MEDICAL DEP'T, KIM SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. MCCLARE et al
as 2:2017cv01457
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MILLER
Defendant:
MCCLARE, JUAREZ, ANGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VOGT v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv01407
Plaintiff:
STEVEN VOGT
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAEZ v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv01375
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO BAEZ
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , BYUNGHAK JIN , MIN HI PARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
