Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
FILBERT v. ZAPPALA et al
as 2:2020cv01858
Defendant: LINDA COHEN, JOY FLOWERS CONTI, MARGRET PICKENS and others
Plaintiff: JOSEPH R. FILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01622
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
STANICH et al v. PICKENS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00120
Plaintiff: ROBERT STANICH , PAUL M. STANICH and DEBORAH L. CANTON
Defendant: SHIRLEY J. PICKENS and POLK CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEATH v. WETZEL, al
as 1:2013cv00278
Plaintiff: JORDAN HEATH
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL, SHIRLEY MOORE-SMEAL, DAVID A. PICKENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REAM v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2011cv00164
Plaintiff: SHANNON REAM
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA , SHIRLEY PICKENS and KATHY J. GARIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARTWRIGHT v. SUPERINTENDENT PICKENS et al
as 3:2010cv00042
Petitioner: ALVA JAMES HARTWRIGHT
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT PICKENS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BUCKS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ARGUETA et al v. WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00275
Plaintiff: GABRIEL ARGUETA, RUSS CLAWSON, CHRISTOPHER BERMUDEZ and others
Defendant: WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. and WASTE MANAGEMENT OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Type: Labor Plaintiff
ROZANCE v. NORMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01758
Plaintiff: VALLIE ROZANCE
Defendant: MICHAEL NORMAN, RONALD D. PICKENS and DONNA VADEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?