Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ROACH v. MCKEAN COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
ANNA M. ROACH
Defendant:
MCKEAN COUNTY, WARDEN DANIEL J. WOOD, JOHN/JANE DOE(S) 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
GOODENOUGH et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01214
Plaintiff:
MARK GOODENOUGH, ROY HARDCASTLE, PHILIP ROACHE and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MADER et al v. UNION TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2020cv01138
Defendant:
GARY SWEAT, KRIS BOCKSTOCE, HEATHER DAERR and others
Plaintiff:
CARLA M. MADER, MIECZYSLAW GNIADEK, MARTIN E. MADER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LITVINUK-ROACH v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2018cv00276
Plaintiff:
DIANE M. LITVINUK-ROACH
Defendant:
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ROACH v. COLEMAN
as 2:2015cv00658
Petitioner:
SHAKIR ROACH
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROACH v. VERTERANO et al
as 2:2014cv00947
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE ROACH
Defendant:
FRANK VERTERANO and VERTERANO & MANOLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROACH V GIROUX ET AL
as 1:2013cv00251
Petitioner:
LOUIS WILLIAM ROACH
Respondent:
PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL and NANCY GIROUX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROACH et al
as 3:2011cv00218
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DARLENE S. ROACH, MELANIE HUMBERTSON and ROY V. HUMBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST v. YONKEY et al
as 2:2010cv00834
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. YONKEY and ROBERT J. ROACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
