Cases 21 - 30 of 86,830
Juan Argueta-Portillo v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1886
Petitioner:
JUAN ALEXANDER ARGUETA-PORTILLO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ayers v. iRhythm Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ayers
Defendant:
Quentin Blackford, Bruce G. Bodaken, Karen Ling and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Daceia Frazier v. Daceia Frazier
as 24-1791
Plaintiff:
DACEIA CHARMAYNE FRAZIER, Lving "Natural" Creator/Trustor/Gantor/Beneficiary/Heir
HEAT AND FROST INSULATORS LOCAL NO. 33 HEALTH FUND v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv06233
Plaintiff:
HEAT AND FROST INSULATORS LOCAL NO. 33 HEALTH FUND
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04055
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant:
APPLE, INC. and APPLE INC.
Petitioner:
PHV NICOLE DEMERS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
BFF II PTE. LTD. et al v. ROSEN et al
as 2:2024cv01228
Plaintiff:
BFF II PTE. LTD., SIDE DOOR VENTURES, LP, SDV OPPORTUNITY FUND II and others
Defendant:
MATTHEW ROSEN and BLAIR JESSE REICH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
