Cases 21 - 30 of 271
Carter v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Michael Carter
Defendant:
Megan Hayes and Adams County Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen et al v. Salem Township
as 3:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Scott Allen, Troy Campbell, Rose Campbell and others
Defendant:
Salem Township
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jane Doe v. Allegheny County Housing Authority, et al
as 23-1105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, FRANK AGGAZIO, Y. BEVERLY MOORE and others
WILSON et al v. TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON et al
as 3:2022cv06936
Plaintiff:
SUSAN WILSON and Merrick Wilson
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON, Michael P Cosma, Joseph J Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 14th Amendment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Randolph v. City of Harrisburg et al
as 1:2022cv01239
Plaintiff:
Samuel Randolph
Defendant:
City of Harrisburg, Robert Fegan, Donald Heffner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
