Cases 1 - 10 of 2,058
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
EDVY v. IACUZIO et al
as 3:2024cv06996
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EDVY
Defendant:
STATE POLICE TROOPER LOUIS C. IACUZIO and 1-3 JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
C. et al v. HATBORO-HORSHAM SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2024cv02605
Plaintiff:
R. C., C. K. and S. C.
Defendant:
HATBORO-HORSHAM SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ROACH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT TRAFFIC DIVISION et al
as 2:2024cv02565
Plaintiff:
MELVIN ANDREW ROACH, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT TRAFFIC DIVISION, NINA WRIGHT PADILLA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PALIN v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2024cv06747
Plaintiff:
TANAJZA PALIN
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, PATRICK J. CALLAHAN, L. BADIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kenneth Talley, et al v. Judith Horn, et al
as 24-1917
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R. TALLEY, JANICE A. TALLEY and KRISTINA KAREN TALLEY
Defendant:
JUDITH C. HORN, DARREN W. HORN, SR., DARREN W. HORN, JR. and others
Robert Cason v. Middlesex County Prosecutors Office, et al
as 24-1969
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G. CASON
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, OLD BRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER G. BRACHT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
