Cases 81 - 90 of 116
In Re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litigation
as 2:2012cv00114
Plaintiff:
Byron Bishop, Bryan Cummings, Ray Ellis and others
Defendant:
Collegiate Licensing Company, Electronic Arts Inc, IMG Worldwide Inc and others
Movant:
Fox Broadcasting Company
In Re:
NCAA Studtent-Athlete Name and Likeness Licensing Litigation
Brodzki v. Fox Broadcasting
as 1:2011cv01147
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Brodzki
Defendant:
Fox Broadcasting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brodzki v. Fox Broadcasting Company
as 1:2011cv00870
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Brodzki
Defendant:
Fox Broadcasting Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mena v. Fox Entertainment Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv05501
Plaintiff:
Stevan Mena
Defendant:
Fox Entertainment Group, Inc., Fox Broadcasting Company, Fox Television Stations, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Suleiman C Edmondson v. Fox Broadcasting Company
as 2:2011cv05838
Plaintiff:
Suleiman C Edmondson
Defendant:
Fox Broadcasting Company
WPIX, Inc et al v. Broadcast Music Inc
as 2:2011cv04052
Respondent:
Broadcast Music Inc
Movant:
Fox Broadcasting Company
Petitioner:
WPIX, Inc
PHILLIPS v. FOX BROADCASTING COMPANY
as 2:2010cv04923
Plaintiff:
EDWARD PHILLIPS
Defendant:
FOX BROADCASTING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arlene Spilfogel v. Fox Broadcasting Company, et al
as 10-12507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARLENE SPILFOGEL
Defendant - Appellee:
FOX BROADCASTING COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation,, LANGLEY PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California Corporation, and TURNER BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., a Georgia Corporation
Stragent, LLC et al v. Match.com, LLC et al
as 6:2010cv00226
Plaintiff:
Stragent, LLC and SeeSaw Foundation
Defendant:
Match.com, LLC, Cupid.com, Inc., eHarmony, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1853
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
