Antitrust Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Chiuchiarelli et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 2:2024cv07290
Plaintiff: Jennifer B. Chiuchiarelli, April H. Yamaichi, Kiyomi Ishii and others
Defendant: APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff: A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant: CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner: MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master: JOSE L. LINARES
In Re: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor: MYLAN INC.
Interested Party: CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00995
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a/ GlaxoSmithKline and others
Interested Party: MEIJER INC.
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Lead Plaintiff: KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Not Yet Classified: MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC., MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C., FWK HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Providence St. Joseph Health et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv03636
Plaintiff: Astera Health, Providence St. Joseph Health, UPMC and others
Defendant: ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S. INC., ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Seroquel XR (Extended Release Quetiapine Fumarate) Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01076
Defendant: Par Pharmaceutical Inc., AstraZeneca UK Limited, Handa Pharmaceuticals LLC and others
Plaintiff: JM Smith Corporation on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Smith Drug Company, Rite Aid Hdqtrs Corp., Walgreen Co. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Hy-Vee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Brandywine Village Associates v. Carlino East Brandywine LP, et al
as 23-2457
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRANDYWINE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES
Defendant / Appellee: CARLINO EAST BRANDYWINE LP, EAST BRANDYWINE TOWNSHIP, CHRISTINA B. WATTERS and others
BRANDYWINE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES v. CARLINO EAST BRANDYWINE, L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv05209
Plaintiff: BRANDYWINE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES
Defendant: CARLINO EAST BRANDYWINE, L.P, EAST BRANDYWINE TOWNSHIP, THOMAS R. WATTERS and others
Interested Party: KAPLIN STEWART MELOFF REITER & STEIN, PC
Special Master: DENNIS SUPLEE, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
BLAIR-SMITH v. CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et al
as 1:2023cv06506
Plaintiff: MONICA BLAIR-SMITH
Defendant: CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,, BOARDWALK REGENCY LLC d/b/a CAESARS ATLANTIC CITY HOTEL & CASINO, HARD ROCK INTERNATIONAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
FABEL v. BOARDWALK 1000, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv06576
Plaintiff: Jacob Fabel
Defendant: BOARDWALK 1000 D/B/A HARD ROCK HOTEL & CASINO ATLANTIC CITY, BOARDWALK REGENCY LLC D/B/A CEASARS ATLANTIC CITY, CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Fabel v. BOARDWALK 1000 LLC et al
as 1:2023cv06548
Plaintiff: Jacob Fabel
Defendant: BOARDWALK 1000 LLC, BOARDWALK REGENCY LLC d/b/a CAESARS ATLANTIC CITY HOTEL & CASINO, Caesars Entertainment and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?