Cases 11 - 20 of 77
ANTHONY v. BERGERON et al
as 1:2020cv02050
Defendant:
DANIEL L/N/U, DRAND, JEAN L/N/U and others
Plaintiff:
MAGGIE HELEN ANTHONY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LLOYD v. POKORNY et al
as 5:2019cv04386
Defendant:
MAUREEN O'CONNOR, STATE OF OHIO, JOSHUA THORNSBERY and others
Plaintiff:
SUSAN LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEAUMONT v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES
as 2:2019cv00918
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN BEAUMONT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YODER v. OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, MONTGOMERY CTY et al
as 2:2019cv01274
Defendant:
MS. TERRY, CHESTER COUNTY PROBATION, PAROLE & PRETRIAL SERVICES, MR. MICHAEL FALIN and others
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA M. YODER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HUGHES v. PET SUPPLIES PLUS/U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04869
Defendant:
PET SUPPLIES PLUS/U.S.A., INC. and PSP STORES LLC
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
WATSON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv04399
Defendant:
MICHAEL KENNEDY, DONALD CAIN, MAUREEN SNYDER and others
Plaintiff:
CARDEL (KHALID) WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL-EPISCOPAL CAMPUS et al
as 2:2018cv04303
Defendant:
SIDDHARTHA SAGREIYA OR SAGVEIYA, "UNKNOWN" SHELLENBERGER, MEGAN SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2018cv01862
Defendant:
Daniel Barrett, Nathan Ross, Daniel Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TCHATCHOUA v. PETERMAN et al
as 2:2017cv01619
Plaintiff:
MAXWELL TCHATCHOUA
Defendant:
JOHN PETERMAN, BERNARD SCOTT, JEREMY ERKEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRISTOBAL v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv09410
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE CRISTOBAL
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, MILDRED SCOTT, KEVIN B. HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
