Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Timothy Booth v. Scott Drissel, et al
as 23-3004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY BOOTH
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPT. SCOTT DRISSEL, LT. TAMIKA ALLAN, SGT. BRIAN MCMENAMIN and others
BOOTH v. CITIZENS BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2022cv05276
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BOOTH and REV. WILLIAM BOOTH
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK, N.A. and NABEEL BHATTI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SCHEID v. FEIGIN et al
as 1:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
JOSEPHINE SCHEID
Defendant:
GERALD A. FEIGIN, EMMANUEL RODRIGUEZ, HALEY MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COWEY et al v. MULLEN et al
as 2:2020cv01845
Defendant:
COL. ROBERT EVANCHICK, SHERIFF WILLIAM MULLEN and COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, INC., EMILY COWEY, CHELSEA SCHMIDT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brett v. D'Andrea et al
as 1:2020cv01398
Defendant:
Shortly Blueh, Chrystal Brown, Barry Mighr and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Khaleem Allah-Bey v. Brett Roberts, et al
as 16-1042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KHALEEM ASIATIC ALLAH BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BRETT A. ROBERTS, STEVEN M. JONES, KENNETH S. BOOTH and others
LEE v. BARKLEY et al
as 2:2015cv05879
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LEE
Defendant:
KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY, KATHLEEN ZWIERZYNA, TARA HOOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEY v. ROBERTS et al
as 2:2015cv04540
Plaintiff:
KHALEEM ASIATIC ALLAH BEY
Defendant:
BRETT A. ROBERTS, STEVEN M. JONES, KENNETH S. BOOTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. CRUZ et al
as 3:2015cv02951
Plaintiff:
MACK TYLER
Defendant:
JACQUELINE CRUZ, LAWRENCE ROSSI, LEE ACUFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boothe v. North East Treatment Centers
as 1:2011cv01149
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Boothe
Defendant:
North East Treatment Centers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
