Cases 1 - 9 of 9
RITCHWOOD v. CITY OF HOBOKEN et al
as 2:2024cv02031
Plaintiff:
JASON RITCHWOOD
Defendant:
CITY OF HOBOKEN, ROBERTO CUEVAS, WILFRED GOMEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CUEVA v. BARR et al
as 2:2019cv00381
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, WILLIAM PELHAM BARR, THOMAS E. BRANDON and others
Plaintiff:
MOE G. CUEVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SOTO v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2018cv11311
Defendant:
ABC ENTITIES 1-5, CITY OF PATERSON, CHIEF OF POLICE TROY OSWALD, in his personal, individual and official capacities, and others
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA SOTO, individually and as proposed Administratrix of the ESTATE OF XAVIER CUEVAS-SOTO, ADRIANNA SOTO and YOLANDA SOTO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Phillip Carl Martin, et al v. United States Marshals, et al
as 15-2642
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTATE OF PHILLIP CARL MARTIN, DWAYNE MARTIN, PHILLIP COREY CLAX and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS, CHRISTOPHER LEONE, EDWARD FALLON and others
DICKERSON v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2014cv06905
Plaintiff:
DARREN A. DICKERSON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, NIGEL SHOCKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INGRAM v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2014cv05519
Plaintiff:
XAVIER INGRAM
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEREMY MERCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ulrich v. Taco Bell et al
as 4:2014cv01703
Plaintiff:
Ashley Ulrich
Defendant:
Taco Bell, Jill Kapes and Dedra Cuevas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
CRUZ v. CUEVAS et al
as 2:2007cv04484
Plaintiff:
JOSE CRUZ
Defendant:
ELISIB CUEVAS, JERSEY CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, JERSEY CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CUEVAS v. SWEENEY et al
as 2:2007cv00905
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP A. CUEVAS
Defendant:
EDWARD SWEENEY and SHAUN THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
