Cases 1 - 10 of 13
ROBERTS v. MALONE et al
as 2:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
BRYAN DAVID ROBERTS, SR.
Defendant:
IAN MALONE, OFFICER WAGNER FARRELL and OFFICER MASSEY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Watkins et al
as 1:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Santonio Pierre Malone
Defendant:
Kent Watkins, J. Russell, Michael O'Pake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH et al
as 2:2021cv05237
Plaintiff:
TORIN MALONE SMITH and AMANDA GERACI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH, et al. v. DOE, et al.
as 2:2021cv05241
Plaintiff:
TORIN MALONE SMITH and AMANDA GERACI
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniels v. United States of America, et al.
as 1:2020cv01692
Plaintiff:
Elmer Daniels
Defendant:
City Of Wilmington, John Does 1-10, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francisca Perez v. Elizabeth Police Department
as 14-3645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCISCA PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES MALONE, LAWRENCE SMITH and others
Francisca Perez v. Elizabeth Police Department, et al
as 14-1760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCISCA PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES MALONE, LAWRENCE SMITH and others
Francisca Perez v. Elizabeth Police Department
as 13-3778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCISCA PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES MALONE, CHRISTOPHER FLATLEY and others
PEREZ v. ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2012cv07839
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCA PEREZ
Defendant:
ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES MALONE, LAWRENCE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NUYANNES v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2011cv04478
Plaintiff:
DAVID J. NUYANNES
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, GERARD MCSHEA, JAMES P. BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
