Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Hecker v. Warden of SCI-Phoenix,et al
as 4:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Christopher Ross Hecker
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Phoenix, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and District Attorney's Office of Centre County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HECKER v. UNKNOWN N/A et al
as 2:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER ROSS HECKER
Respondent:
UNKNOWN N/A, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF UNKNOWN /N/A and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF UNKNOWN / N/A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lenny Ross v. Administrator East Jersey State Prison, et al
as 23-1240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LENNY ROSS
Defendant / Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Tola Ross v. Superintendent Pine Grove SCI, et al
as 22-3272
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOLA ROSS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT PINE GROVE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
YEAGER v. SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER et al
as 1:2021cv00227
Petitioner:
SUSAN ELAINE YEAGER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER, D.A ROSS MCKEIRNAN, BERNARD T. HESSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ross v. May et al
as 1:2021cv00825
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Petitioner:
Frank L. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ross v. Spaulding
as 3:2021cv00726
Petitioner:
Michael Ross
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JAMES et al v. CRANSTON et al
as 3:2021cv02667
Petitioner:
DYRELL WRIGHT, ISAIAH JAMES, ANTHONY NWAKA and others
Respondent:
WARDEN MARK CRANSTON and CAPTAIN GROVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BROWN v. CIRILLO et al
as 2:2020cv12290
Respondent:
THEODORE N. STEVENS, WARDEN ANDERSON and GUY CIRILLO
Petitioner:
ROSS W. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROSS v. WARDEN TRATE
as 1:2020cv00211
Respondent:
WARDEN TRATE
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN R. ROSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
