Cases 1 - 10 of 38
PITTMAN v. RIVELLO et al
as 5:2023cv04675
Petitioner:
GABRIEL PITTMAN
Respondent:
J. RIVELLO, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gabriel Pittman v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 22-3117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GABRIEL ISHAM PITTMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
VARGAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv06236
Petitioner:
GABRIEL VARGAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pittman v. "Concurrent Jurisdiction of U.S." et al
as 1:2022cv01589
Petitioner:
Gabriel Pittman
Respondent:
"Concurrent Jurisdiction of U.S.", Superintendent Rivello and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARNES v. SLAUGHTER et al
as 2:2021cv19904
Petitioner:
GABRIEL C. BARNES
Respondent:
JAMES SLAUGHTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOPEZ v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2021cv03353
Petitioner:
GABRIEL MARTIN LOPEZ
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PITTMAN v. SMITH
as 3:2021cv00083
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH
Petitioner:
GABRIEL ISHAM PITTMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GREENIDGE v. LEHNOWSKY et al
as 2:2020cv06476
Defendant:
WELLPATH, LLC, MANFREY, STEPHEN WIENER and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL GREENIDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERNANDEZ v. DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
as 3:2019cv00222
Petitioner:
Gabriel Garcia Hernandez
Respondent:
DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Amador v. Quay
as 1:2019cv02051
Petitioner:
Gabriel Amador
Respondent:
Warden H. Quay and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
