Cases 1 - 10 of 17
PORTER v. USA
as 1:2021cv00125
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JESSE W. PORTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PORTER v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2020cv00910
Petitioner:
DONALD PORTER
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and KEVIN KAUFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PORTER v. JOHNSON
as 2:2017cv02796
Petitioner:
OSCAR PORTER
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PORTER v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv00025
Petitioner:
SHURON PORTER
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, THOMAS F. MERRICK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyrone Porter v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 16-2655
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE PORTER
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Porter v. Cameron et al
as 3:2015cv01625
Petitioner:
Tyrone Porter
Respondent:
Kenneth Cameron and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. I.R.S. et al
as 1:2015cv01311
Petitioner:
HERBERT JOHNSON
Respondent:
I.R.S. , L. FOWLER, DEIDRE MORRON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PORTER v. D'ILIO et al
as 2:2014cv02999
Petitioner:
OSCAR PORTER
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PORTER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03420
Petitioner:
FRED PORTER
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ernest Porter v. Sec PA Department of Corr, et al
as 12-2000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST PORTER, PADRP
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
