Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Ramsey Randall v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, et al
as 24-1512
Plaintiff:
RAMSEY RANDALL
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ELLIOT L. SMEAL, Parole Manager, (PBPP) CHAIR MANWOMAN, (Name Unknown) and others
Robert Davis v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-2401
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT K. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and RANDALL SEARS
RAMSEY RANDALL v. (PBPP) PA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ET AL
as 5:2023cv01389
Petitioner:
RAMSEY RANDALL and ANONYMOUS AND ALSO WESLEY MILTON
Respondent:
(PBPP) PA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ELLIOT SMEAL, PBPP CHAIR MAN/WOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SMITH v. DIRECTOR
as 1:2023cv00916
Petitioner:
Randall Todd Smith
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robert Davis v. Randall Sears, et al
as 22-3461
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT K. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDALL N. SEARS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
BUTTON v. PA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 1:2022cv00160
Petitioner:
RANDALL BUTTON
Respondent:
PA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI ALBION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROLISON v. PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2021cv02556
Petitioner:
RANDALL ROLISON
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROLISON v. NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL
as 2:2021cv02172
Petitioner:
RANDALL ROLISON
Respondent:
NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PA, BUCKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BACON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2021cv01116
Respondent:
GOVERNOR PHILLIP D. MURPHY, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, RANDALL K. MCCUTCHEON and others
Petitioner:
THOMAS BACON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
