Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Lampkin v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2017cv01562
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lampkin
Defendant:
David J. Ebbert and S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eunice Husband v. Warden Lewisburg USP, et al
as 17-1191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUNICE HUSBAND
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP, B. TAGGERT, Captain, USP - Lewisburg, D. KNAPP, S.I.S. Lieutenant, USP - Lewisburg and others
Husband v. Ebbert et al
as 3:2016cv02255
Plaintiff:
Eunice Husband
Defendant:
David J Ebbert, B. Taggert, D Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Correct Care Solution et al
as 3:2016cv02053
Plaintiff:
Keith S. Brown
Defendant:
Correct Care Solution , Mental Health Manager Corporation, Department of Correctional and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Brown v. Scott Holtzapple, et al
as 15-2201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
ACTING WARDEN SCOTT HOLTZAPPLE, ACTING WARDEN J. BUTLER, CAPTAIN B. TAGGERT and others
Brown v. Holtzapple et al
as 3:2015cv00711
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
Scott Holtzapple, J. Butler, B. Trate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Juan Diaz, Jr. v. Warden Lewisburg USP, et al
as 14-4041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN DIAZ, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP, REGIONAL MEDICAL DIRECTOR, Name Unknown, H.S.A. S BROWN and others
Chandler v. Brown et al
as 1:2014cv01530
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr.
Defendant:
S. Brown, Kevin Pigos and Karen Massey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NERI v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2013cv03722
Plaintiff:
PHILIP G. NERI
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, JAMES PLOUIS, CRAIG SHINDEWOLF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willie Davis v. S. Brown, et al
as 13-2575
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. BROWN and WARDEN BRYON A. BLEDSOE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
