Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Travillion v. Harry et al
as 4:2023cv01335
Plaintiff:
Jamar L. Travillion
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Bobbi Jo Salamon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. RUSSO et al
as 3:2023cv01514
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ALEXANDER
Defendant:
DARRIN RUSSO, TIM PINO, KYM WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lapp v. Nye et al
as 1:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Katie F. Lapp
Defendant:
George Nye, Tim Burns, LT. McCabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sewell v. Betti et al
as 1:2022cv01527
Plaintiff:
Paul Sewell
Defendant:
Tim Betti, Lackawanna County Prison Board, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Tisdale v. Tim Betti, et al
as 22-2755
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES J. TISDALE
Defendant / Appellee:
TIM BETTI, Warden, WELLPATH MEDICAL, DR. AMED and others
Dennis v. Boulos et al
as 1:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Dennis and Abdul a.m. Shakur
Defendant:
Dr. Tim Boulos, New Castle County Police Department and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wong v. Betti et al
as 1:2022cv01063
Plaintiff:
Steven Wong
Defendant:
Tim Betti, Wellpath and Lackawanna County Jail Administration Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soler v. Betti et al
as 1:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
Luis Soler
Defendant:
Tim Betti, Krista Puris, Jessica and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nieves v. Geroulo et al
as 4:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Luis Nieves
Defendant:
Vito Tim Geroulo, Tim Betti and Donna Varner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tisdale v. Betti et al
as 1:2021cv01849
Plaintiff:
James J. Tisdale
Defendant:
Tim Betti, WellPath Medical, Dr. Amed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
