Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Ivan McKinney v. Fitzgerald, et al
as 24-1552
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
SGT. FITZGERALD, OFFICER FORBES, GEORGE ROBINSON, Asst Administrator and others
CARATINI v. POWELL et al
as 1:2021cv11061
Defendant:
WILLIE BONDS, SGT. D. SHEEHAN, SGT. D. CAIN and others
Plaintiff:
PETER L. CARATINI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLOVER v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2021cv01644
Plaintiff:
CARLOW GLOVER and CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
MARY ANN SWIFT, P/O/ KEITH QUICK, P/O CPL. W SHIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARATINI v. POWELL et al
as 1:2020cv08924
Defendant:
DAVID METELOW, ASST. SUPERINTENDENT LISA SWIFT, SCO. APRIL WASHINGTON and others
Plaintiff:
PETER L. CARATINI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOTON v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2019cv00008
Defendant:
DEPUTY MAZUKIEWIEZ, LIEUTENANT SUPERVISED CELL EXTRACTION TEAM UNIT, DORINE VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
MYRON MOTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MCKINNEY v. FITZGERALD et al
as 3:2018cv12987
Defendant:
ROBERT CHERTERKIN, ANTHONY CAMPOS, OFFICER FORBES and others
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moton v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv01304
Defendant:
Deputy Mazukiewiez, Lieutenant Supervised Cell Extraction Team Unit, Dorine Varner and others
Plaintiff:
Myron Moton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fahs v. Swift et al
as 3:2018cv00079
Plaintiff:
Dillan C. Fahs
Defendant:
Gerald Swift, Alicia, Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv06898
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DAVIS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY L. LANIGAN, VICTOR TAPIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CHESTER COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv01138
Plaintiff:
GARTOR KIKI BROWN
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY, CHESTER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, CHESTER COUNTY SHERIFF JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
