Cases 21 - 30 of 52
RAMBERT v. SMEAD et al
as 1:2016cv00296
Plaintiff:
ERIC RAMBERT
Defendant:
ANTHONY SMEAD, J. NEAL, BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Rambert v. Jamie Ferkdarko, et al
as 16-4275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMIE FERKDARKO, RNS, LISA ZUPSIC, ND.C, GARY PRINKEY, RNS and others
HANCOCK v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv05754
Plaintiff:
HEATHER HANCOCK
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE (PENNSYLVANIA) et al
as 2:2016cv01161
Plaintiff:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE (PENNSYLVANIA) , DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION(S) , HEATHER HILDENBRANDT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
PEW v. NOEL et al
as 1:2016cv00178
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
PAUL NOEL, CARL KELDTE, KIM SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUNNINGHAM v. ZUBSIC et al
as 1:2016cv00127
Plaintiff:
DONALD K. CUNNINGHAM, JR.
Defendant:
LISA ZUBSIC, HEATHER MCKEEL, NP-C and JAMIE FERDARKO, RNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. OVERMEYER et al
as 1:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL OVERMEYER, J.A. HORTON, D.F. OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACK v. SMITH et al
as 1:2015cv00254
Plaintiff:
RYAN BLACK
Defendant:
KIM SMITH and HEATHER G. MCKEEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAYO v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MAYO
Defendant:
KENNETH CAMERON, DORETTA CHENCHARICK, PEGGY BAUGHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 2:2015cv01085
Plaintiff:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, JEREMY STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
