Cases 81 - 90 of 223
ASHFORD v. SCI-MAHANOY et al
as 3:2020cv00618
Defendant:
SGT. RICIGLIANO, Valentine, Traci Jacobson and others
Plaintiff:
AILEAF ASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASHFORD v. SCI-MAHANOY et al
as 2:2020cv00474
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER KELLNER, SGT. RICIGLIANO, TRACI JACOBSON and others
Plaintiff:
AILEAF ASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENDES v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2019cv02087
Plaintiff:
MR. ADAM JOSHUA MENDES
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 2, CGO- MS. D. VARNER, LIETENANT A. LITWHILER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAYNARD v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv05459
Defendant:
JERRY ANKROM, GENA CLARK, MICHAEL BURTON and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY BAYNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. CAPTAIN CRUM et al
as 2:2019cv01460
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
MAJOR BAZUS, LT. TROUT, CERT TEAM JOHN DOES 1 TO 12 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MENDES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv04982
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, LIETENANT A. LITWHILER, MR. JOHN RAMSON and others
Plaintiff:
MR. ADAM JOSHUA MENDES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2019cv04921
Defendant:
ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK, EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER MONTGOMERY, SHERRI JONES and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. JOHN DOE #2 OR MR. VINCE et al
as 2:2019cv04311
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1 OR MR. VON and JOHN DOE #2 OR MR. VINCE
Plaintiff:
MARK GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHRUBY v. SIANNI et al
as 2:2019cv04206
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK SCHRUBY and TEEF
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, CLAYTON, JANE DOE NURSE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. DRISCOLL et al
as 3:2019cv00143
Defendant:
JOEL BARROWS, DAVID CLOSE, SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMTIH and others
Plaintiff:
ARNELL MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
