Cases 81 - 90 of 15,662
CHAMBERS v. GLEN MILLS SCHOOLS et al
as 2:2024cv03250
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS/EDUCATION, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS/EDUCATION, STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ROY CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Brown v. Brooke Civello, et al
as 24-2324
Defendant:
BROOKE CIVELLO, PSYCHOLOGIST, DR. BLOOM, PSYCH DOCTOR and JOYCE KNOWLES, PSYCH DOCTOR
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BROWN
Kevin Coit v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2322
Defendant:
SGT HUNT, State Trooper, LT DIEHL, SUPERINTENDENT KLINEFIELDER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
BOCINA v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2024cv03262
Defendant:
GRIEVANCE SUPERVISOR, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL, JOY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOCINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS et al v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv01049
Defendant:
MELINDA ADAMS, BOWERS, ROTH and others
Plaintiff:
TONY YEAGINS and JAJUAN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. NICKLES et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Defendant:
WARDEN ABBY TATE, DEPUTY WARDEN SHAWN EDMUNSON, LT MOORE and others
Plaintiff:
NIHEIM MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: DARREN PAYNE
as 2:2024cv03210
Plaintiff:
DARREN PAYNE
Defendant:
SGT. TIPPY, LOVE, MS. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: MATTOS
as 2:2024cv03227
Plaintiff:
MARIANO MATTOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PASSARELLA v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2024cv03256
Defendant:
C/O WALTON, SGT. SERODY, CORRECTION OFFICER V. HILTON and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. PASSARELLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFIS v. BLOOM et al
as 3:2024cv00172
Defendant:
BLOOM, FOOD SERVICE MANAGER, CHCA and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY RAY GRIFFIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
