Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Atkins v. Hudson County Rehabilitation Center et al
as 2:2023cv01949
Plaintiff:
MARK ATKINS
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY REHABILITATION CENTER and Hudson County Rehabilitation Center Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdul Kanu v. Warden George Hill Correctiona, et al
as 16-2769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL KANU
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN GEORGE HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, LEACH, Chief of Security, MICHAEL MOORE, Classification and others
ATKINS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv01139
Plaintiff:
KEITH ATKINS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and M. FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KANU v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2013cv06451
Plaintiff:
ABDUL KANU
Defendant:
LINDSEY WARDEN , LEACH , MICHAEL MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karl Manuel v. Atkins, et al
as 13-3089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL B. MANUEL
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT ATKINS, as employee at Sussex Violation of Probation Center (SVOP), WARDEN WILLIAM OETTELS, as employee at Sussex Violation of Probation Center (SVOP), DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, (DELDOT) and others
GARRETT v. LINDSAY et al
as 2:2013cv02874
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ALI GARRETT
Defendant:
CAMERON LINDSAY, FELTON, ATKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 11-1560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH W. BOOTH, JACK MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG and others
Debtor - Appellee:
LINCOLN D. WILLIS
ATKINS v. DELANEY
as 2:2011cv00097
Plaintiff:
KEITH ATKINS, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manuel v. Atkins et al
as 1:2010cv00962
Plaintiff:
Karl B. Manuel
Defendant:
Atkins, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WAHEED v. ATKINS
as 2:2009cv00467
Plaintiff:
BAKIRAH WAHEED
Defendant:
A. ATKINS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
