Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Williamson et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2023cv01781
Plaintiff:
Bobby Kenneth Williamson, Antonio Bundy and Nicholas Edwards
Defendant:
John E Wetzel, Tabb Bickell, Erin Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMSON et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv03857
Plaintiff:
BOBBY KENNETH WILLIAMSON, ANTONIO BUNDY and NICHOLAS EDWARDS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, TABB BICKELL, ERIN BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards et al v. Rivello et al
as 1:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Edwards, John Hightower, Muwsa Green and others
Defendant:
J. Rivello, A. Wakefield, N. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Rambert, et al v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 16-4228
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ERIC X. RAMBERT, ANTHONY JOHNSON, MICHAEL BUNDY and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY, SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, D. F. OBERLANDER, DSCS and others
SMITH v. D'ILIO et al
as 3:2016cv07633
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE SMITH
Defendant:
STEPHEN D'ILIO, GRUNDY, BUNDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Rambert, et al v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 16-3778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ANTHONY JOHNSON, MICHAEL BUNDY, JOHN PASSMORE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY, D. F. OBERLANDER, DSCS and others
BUNDY v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv05978
Plaintiff:
REGINALD BUNDY
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMBERT et al v. GRISBY et al
as 1:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
ERIC X. RAMBERT, ANTHONY R. JOHNSON, MICHAEL BUNDY and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
