Cases 1 - 10 of 167
Ceasar v. Bradley et al
as 2:2021cv01643
Defendant:
CORIZON, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Dr. Elizabeth Bradley and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Ceasar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAVIS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv01441
Defendant:
WETZEL, DIRECTOR OF PRISON HEALTH SERVICE UNIT, S.C.I. WAYMART, U.M. KAY and others
Plaintiff:
CHAVIS and RONALD CHAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARMON v. GIBBS et al
as 2:2017cv01653
Plaintiff:
SCOTT T. HARMON
Defendant:
DENNIS GIBBS, JEFFERY ROEHANNA, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Demetrius Bailey v. Melissa McMahon, et al
as 17-2631
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MELISSA MCMAHON, T. GIMBENSKI, DORINA VARNER and others
James Lomax v. Frank Tennis, et al
as 17-1282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LOMAX
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK TENNIS, RICHARD ELLERS, JOHN SYMONS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES
LOMAX v. TENNIS et al
as 2:2016cv06566
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOMAX
Defendant:
FRANK J. TENNIS, RICHARD ELLERS, JOHN SYMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. BAUGHMAN et al
as 3:2016cv00266
Plaintiff:
CHARLES T. JONES
Defendant:
PEGGY BAUGHMAN, KENNETH CAMERON, DORETTA CHENCHARICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demetrius Bailey v. Melissa McMahon, et al
as 16-4155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MELISSA MCMAHON, T. GIMBENSKI, DORINA VARNER and others
Defendant - Non-Participating:
ANGELA AUGMAN and PRISON HEALTH SERVICES
WALLS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv06240
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. WALLS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL, ERIC TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
