Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 41
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY et al v. BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al
as 5:2019cv04846
Plaintiff: FAIRFAX COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY, CITY OF RICHMOND, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD and others
Defendant: JOHN DOE NOS. 1-50 and BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
IN RE: DEPOSITION OF TIANNA GRIFFIN
as 2:2019mc00150
Defendant: ROBIN RICHBURG, MELISA WASHECHEK, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
In Re: DEPOSITION OF TIANNA GRIFFIN
Plaintiff: ADAIR BOROUGHS
Connecticut et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02407
Plaintiff: State of North Dakota, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant: ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., Richard Rogerson, WOCKHARDT USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Commissioners of Public Works of the City of Charleston et al v. USALCO, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv12197
Plaintiff: Commission of Public Works of the City of Greenville SC, Commissioners of Public Works of the City of Charleston, City of Winston-Salem and others
Defendant: Delta Chemical Corporation, USALCO LLC, John Doe Nos. 1 - 50 and others
In Re: LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Commissioners of Public Works of the City of Charleston et al v. USALCO, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv12197
Plaintiff: Commission of Public Works of the City of Greenville SC, Commissioners of Public Works of the City of Charleston, City of Winston-Salem and others
Defendant: Delta Chemical Corporation, USALCO LLC, John Doe Nos. 1 - 50 and others
In Re: LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al v. President United States, et al
as 19-1189
Undetermined: PROFESSOR DAVID F.FORTE, PROFESSOR MICHAEL P. MORELAND, PROFESSOR RICHARD EPSTEIN and others
Defendant / Appellant: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF NEW JERSEY and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant / Appellee: PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al v. President United States, et al
as 19-1129
Undetermined: PROFESSOR MICHAEL P. MORELAND, PROFESSOR CARL H. ESBECK, PROFESSOR RICHARD EPSTEIN and others
Defendant / Appellee: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF NEW JERSEY and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner / Appellant: LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME
Commission of Public Works of the City of Spartanburg et al v. General Chemical Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv09231
Plaintiff: Commission of Public Works of the City of Spartanburg , City of Winston-Salem and South Carolina Public Service Authority
Defendant: GENERAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, GENERAL CHEMICAL PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LLC, GENERAL CHEMICAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities v. TitleMax of Delaware, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02112
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities
Defendant: TitleMax of Delaware, Inc. , TitleMax of Ohio, Inc. , TitleMax of Virginia, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STATE OF CONNECTICUT et al v. AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv03768
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant: EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., LANNETT COMPANY, INC. and others
In Re: STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL LITIGATION
Respondent: STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL PLAINTIFFS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?