Cases 31 - 40 of 374
HOPKINS v. ROGERS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05613
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
ROGERS CORPORATION, BRUCE D HOECHNER, KEITH L BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Finger v. Rogers Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01798
Plaintiff:
Katherine Finger
Defendant:
Rogers Corporation, Keith L. Barnes, Megan Faust and others
PERDIGAO v. CONTOUR MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv19417
Plaintiff:
Nilson Perdigao
Defendant:
Contour Mortgage Corporation, Shane Weicberger, Charlene Fassle and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
JUSTICE, II v. THE EXONE COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv04607
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D JUSTICE, II
Defendant:
THE EXONE COMPANY, S. KENT ROCKWELL, JOHN HARTNER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Jones v. The ExOne Company et al
as 1:2021cv01474
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
The ExOne Company, John F. Hartner, S. Kent Rockwell and others
Martin Rogers v. Willie Bonds, et al
as 21-2891
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN LUTHER ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY HEALTHCARE, C. RALPH, DHO and others
Defendant:
MONICA TSAKIRIS, APN, LISA RENEE MILLS, RN NP, RAHEIM SUMMERS and others
CAMPANELLA v. THE EXONE COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv01302
Plaintiff:
PIETRO CAMPANELLA
Defendant:
THE EXONE COMPANY, S. KENT ROCKWELL, JOHN HARTNER and others
KONG v. THE EXONE COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv04165
Plaintiff:
ZHAOQUN KONG
Defendant:
THE EXONE COMPANY, JOHN F. HARTNER, S. KENT ROCKWELL and others
Alex Leone v. Essex County Prosecutor Invest, et al
as 21-2684
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEX G. LEONE
Defendant / Appellee:
ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR INVESTIGATORS OFFICE, THEODORE N. STEPHENS, GWENDOLYN WILLIAMS and others
Debtor / Appellee:
ROMESH SUKHDEO
Ronald Rogers v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 21-2601
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
