Cases 71 - 80 of 290
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00435
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
GOODEN v. WALTON et al
as 2:2021cv00190
Defendant:
AARON WALTON, EPCOT CRENSHAW, THOMAS S. MULLER and others
Plaintiff:
WARREN E. GOODEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06523
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, JOHN DOES 1-100, HOYOUNG HUH and others
Plaintiff:
DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Morris Smith v. Rowley, et al
as 20-3577
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MORRIS ASMAR SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ROWLEY
CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06475
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., JAMES MONSEES, JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
PENNCREST SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00364
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, ADAM BOWEN, RIAZ VALANI and others
Plaintiff:
PENNCREST SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
WARREN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00365
Defendant:
PHILLIP MORRIS USA, INC., JAMES MONSEES, ADAM BOWEN and others
Plaintiff:
WARREN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01984
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, ADAM BOWEN, JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
BROWNSVILLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01985
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, ADAM BOWEN, RIAZ VALANI and others
Plaintiff:
BROWNSVILLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
BRENTWOOD BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01986
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, ADAM BOWEN, RIAZ VALANI and others
Plaintiff:
BRENTWOOD BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
