Cases 1 - 10 of 54
MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C. v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv02956
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and others
Plaintiff:
MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
FWK HOLDINGS, LLC. v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv02958
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and others
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MLI RX LLC et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv02960
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and others
Plaintiff:
MLI RX LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP., AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORP. and others
Interested Party:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
FWK HOLDINGS, LLC. v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv00757
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
FWK HOLDINGS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C. v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv00480
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MLI RX LLC et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv00429
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
MLI RX LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP., AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Lamictal Direct Purchas, et al, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 19-1655
Defendant / Appellant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, DBA SmithKline Beecham Corp, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROCHESTER DRUG COOPERATIVE INC, KING DRUG CO OF FLORENCE INC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO INC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017mc00164
Plaintiff:
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. , KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC. and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS
Thirdparty_defendant:
NORTHSTAR RX LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Type:
Other Statutes
LOUISANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017mc00163
Plaintiff:
LOUISANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. , KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC. and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS
Thirdparty_defendant:
APOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Type:
Other Statutes
IN Re: Flonase Antitrust Litig
as 16-3019
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IBEW NECA LOCAL 505 HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN, A F OF L A G C BUILDING TRADES WELFARE PLAN, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF LOUISIANA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.