Cases 91 - 100 of 100
Melrose Inc v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 08-4425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELROSE INC
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, CITY OF PGH ZONING BD OF ADJUSTMENT, CLIFFORD B. LEVINE, Esq. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
EL BEY v. NORTH BRUNSWICK MUNICIPAL COURT
as 3:2008cv02825
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD JEFFERSON EL BEY
Respondent:
NORTH BRUNSWICK MUNICIPAL COURT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILLIAMS v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2007cv03893
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RANSOM v. EASTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2007cv02999
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD RANSOM, SR.
Defendant:
EASTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT and LOUIS COXE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ThirdParty Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
MELROSE, INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, et al
as 2:2002cv01161
Plaintiff:
MELROSE, INC.
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH , CITY OF PITTSBURGH ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT , CLIFFORD B. LEVINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
