Cases 171 - 180 of 75,394
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01978
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SIRLIN GALLOGLY & LESSER, PC, BARBARA A. FEIN LAW OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLACKS v. LITTLE EGG HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2024cv02923
Plaintiff:
LAQUITA BLACKS
Defendant:
LITTLE EGG HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT, TUCKERTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, PINELAND REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANTHONY v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ANTHONY
Defendant:
MICHAEL LEWIS, PHILIP TREADWAY and SEAN GERCKEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Walters v. City of Harrisburg et al
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Paul Walters
Defendant:
City of Harrisburg, Harrisburg Bureau of Police and CPL. Donald Bender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
