Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv07123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv07097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
IN RE: CAMDEN POLICE CASES
as 1:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
ALANDA FORREST , JEFFREY HICKS , FRANK SHAW and others
Defendant:
KEVIN PARRY, JASON STETSER, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHAVEZ v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00513
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHAVEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maria Argueta, et al v. US Immigration and Customs Enf, et al
as 10-1479
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARIA ARGUETA, WALTER CHAVEZ, ANA GALINDO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN P. TORRES, Deputy Assistant Director for Operations, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, SCOTT WEBER, Director, Office of Detention and Removal Operations, Newark Field Office, BARTOLOME RODRIGUEZ, Former Director, Office of Detention and Removal Operations, Newark Field Office and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN LOE PENNS GROVE OFFICERS 1-10, JOHN DOE ICE AGENTS 1-60, US IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENF, ("ICE") and others
WALTERS v. SEPTA et al
as 2:2007cv03531
Plaintiff:
ART WALTERS
Defendant:
SEPTA, G. K. PRATTER, TONY MOSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAVEZ v. HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2007cv00505
Plaintiff:
NATHAN CHAVEZ and NATHAN CHAVEZ
Defendant:
HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP, POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL MARKUN and POLICE OFFICER ERIC YERDON
Mediator:
KENNETH J. BENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
