Cases 11 - 20 of 273
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rankin v. Shapiro et al.
as 1:2023cv01859
Plaintiff:
Clarence Robert Rankin
Defendant:
Josh Shapiro, Xavior Becerra, Kilolo Kijakazi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AGNITA HOIST v. ATHENA BITCOIN ATM et al
as 3:2023cv21905
Plaintiff:
MYA MARY ANITA HOIST and MYA MARY AGNITA HOIST
Defendant:
ATHENA BITCOIN ATM, N.J. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARRIS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
COREY L. HARRIS and COREY L. HARRIS, SR.
Defendant:
JULIA ANN WILLIAMS, MARSHALL J. PICCINNINI, MARSHALL J. PICCINNI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ADAMS v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 5:2023cv04195
Plaintiff:
KRISTI ADAMS
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
John Miller v. Thomas Nelling, et al
as 23-2788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN RYAN MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS NELLING, THOMAS GOGGIN, JOHN O'DONNELL and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH ELIAS, TRACEY LAWS, MITCHELL ROCK and others
SANTIAGO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv03317
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROSARIO SANTIAGO
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
