Cases 11 - 20 of 304
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv20772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
GOOLD et al v. OPERA et al
as 2:2023cv03527
Plaintiff:
SHERRY ANN GOOLD and BRADFORD E. WILSON
Defendant:
DANIEL OPERA, MARY ROSE OPERA, UPPER SOUTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kuntz v. McPherson
as 4:2023cv01496
Plaintiff:
Lance Christian Kuntz
Defendant:
Tom Rose McPherson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
EL BEY v. JACOBS et al
as 2:2023cv03907
Defendant:
MOSES JACOBS, JACOB FRIEDMAN, JACOB FERFERKORN and others
Plaintiff:
TAKARA EL BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
BEY v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2023cv03376
Plaintiff:
TAKARA BEY
Defendant:
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ABRAHAM KINSTILINGER ESQ. and ROSE TERRACE HOLDINGS LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSE-THOMPSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYVLANIA
as 2:2023cv01029
Plaintiff:
AMBER ROSE-THOMPSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
ROSE-THOMPSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2023cv01028
Plaintiff:
AMBER ROSE-THOMPSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MARY ROSE 22, LLC v. ROKES et al
as 2:2023cv02544
Defendant:
THE TRUST COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, BERGENFIELD STATE BANK, ESTELLA ROKES and others
Plaintiff:
MARY ROSE 22, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
