Cases 21 - 30 of 645
Happle v. D'Angelo
as 1:2023cv01399
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
Dana D'Angelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Happle v. John
as 1:2023cv01401
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
Judge John Paparrazzo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Happle v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv01400
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
C. P. Wilson and M. Staton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harris v. Taurasi et al
as 1:2023cv01974
Plaintiff:
Cornelius E. Harris
Defendant:
Lee Ann Taurasi, Robert Martin, Eric Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
POWERS v. WEBB et al
as 2:2023cv04679
Plaintiff:
RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS
Defendant:
JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Ricky Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Colgate Palmolive Co, et al
as 23-2982
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
Defendant / Appellee:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO, HILLS PET NUTRITION, NATURASOURCE INTERNATIONAL LLC and others
Defendant:
MS. KIM, DEBRA NICHOLS, DAVE BALOGA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Pierre et al v. Martin et al
as 3:2023cv01724
Plaintiff:
Macarton N. Pierre, Jane Doe and Yolanda R. Browning
Defendant:
Ian D. Martin, John B. Pike and Brian M. Szumski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
