Cases 21 - 30 of 297
PERRY v. FADDIS, et al
as 2:2022cv04012
Plaintiff:
AVERY MIGUEL PERRY, SR.
Defendant:
OFFICER MELANIE FADDIS, OFFICER ANDREW MILLARD, OFFICER SERGEANT MATTHEW KUHNERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
PERRY v. SILOW
as 2:2022cv02962
Plaintiff:
AVERY MIGUEL PERRY, SR.
Defendant:
HON. JUDGE SILOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PERRY v. 38TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
as 2:2022cv02704
Plaintiff:
AVERY MIGUEL PERRY, SR.
Defendant:
38TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEWIS v. FIETKIEWICZ et al
as 2:2022cv04171
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant:
JOHN M. FIETKIEWICZ, HOLLY K KULKA, JOHN GAY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
PERRY v. STACKHOUSE
as 2:2022cv02208
Plaintiff:
AVERY MIGUEL PERRY, SR.
Defendant:
JASON STACKHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
PERRY v. MCINTOSH
as 2:2022cv02206
Plaintiff:
AVERY MIGUEL PERRY, SR.
Defendant:
SCOTT C. MCINTOSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PERRY v. FREDERICK et al
as 2:2022cv01973
Plaintiff:
AVERY MIGUEL PERRY, SR.
Defendant:
ANNA C. FREDERICK, ESQ. and CHESTER COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PERRY et al v. PAOLILLO (ROMERO) et al
as 2:2022cv01872
Plaintiff:
AVERY MIGUEL PERRY, SR. and A.P., JR.
Defendant:
MICHELE PAOLILLO (ROMERO), BRIANNA PAOLILLO and MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PERRY HOMES, INC.
as 2:2022cv00526
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PERRY HOMES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
